Is it innovative for politicians to profess a wish to follow their conscience, as stated by a local councillor at the full council meeting of May 15?

If so, would history be re-written if those who condemn them had confessed then corrected their own mistakes?

Has failing to do that compounded the disastrous legacy for the next generations?

If politicians believe it is not innovative how does one explain how the rich got richer and the poor poorer?

Can ‘positive thinking’ be an excuse for a ‘get out of jail free’ card, and be victimless?

Does conscience require reason, and is answerable?

Bob Whitfield
Morden